
WASHINGTON — Four U.S. Catholic publications with a broad range of audiences have come together in a joint editorial citing Church leaders in calling for an end to the death penalty in the United States.
“Capital punishment must end,” stated a March 5 editorial by America magazine, the National Catholic Register, the National Catholic Reporter and Our Sunday Visitor.
The death penalty is both “abhorrent and unnecessary,” the publications said, arguing that the practice of capital punishment drains resources in court battles that would be “better deployed in preventing crime in the first place and working toward restorative justice for those who commit less heinous crimes.”
The joint editorial comes a month before the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case challenging lethal-injection protocol as cruel and unusual punishment. Last year saw a string of botched executions: Inmates in at least three different states were observed gasping for breath, choking, convulsing and clenching their fists. In one case, an inmate took nearly two hours to die. In another, an inmate died of a massive heart attack half an hour after the lethal injection.
In their editorial, the Catholic publications highlighted the words of Church leaders in opposition to the death penalty. They pointed to St. John Paul II’s 1997 addition to the Catechism, which teaches that cases where the death penalty is necessary “are very rare, if not practically nonexistent,” as well as Pope Francis’ exhortation last year for Catholics “to fight … for the abolition of the death penalty.”
Within the U.S., the editorial also referenced the words of numerous bishops against the use of the death penalty in recent decades. Archbishop Paul Coakley of Oklahoma City called for a re-examination of the death penalty after a botched execution in his state last year. Last month, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput reiterated his repeated statements on the subject, saying, “When we take a guilty person’s life, we only add to the violence in an already violent culture, and we demean our own dignity in the process.”
Earlier this year, Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski, who chairs the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, stressed that “the use of the death penalty devalues human life and diminishes respect for human dignity.”
Boston Cardinal Sean O’Malley, head of the bishops’ pro-life committee, echoed these words, emphasizing that society can protect itself in other ways than the death penalty, adding that “institutionalized practices of violence against any person erode reverence for the sanctity of every human life.”
“We, the editors of four Catholic journals … urge the readers of our diverse publications and the whole U.S. Catholic community and all people of faith to stand with us and say, ‘Capital punishment must end,’” said the publications.
Addressing the claim that the death penalty brings closure to the families of victims, the editorial pointed to the words of a Mercy Sister, whose order holds an annual service for Families and Friends of Murder Victims. The sister said that the mothers who attend the event never ask for the death penalty because they say that they do not want another family to suffer what they have suffered.
Jeanette De Melo, editor in chief of the Register, explained the joint editorial as an effort to embrace the gospel of life proclaimed by St. John Paul II and his successors.
“While we recognize that the Church has allowed for the legitimate use of the death penalty for society’s self-defense, we find that it’s harder and harder to argue that a particular act of capital punishment is circumstantially necessary today in contemporary America,” she said.
“Unity among Catholics in defense of life can send a powerful message. Euthanasia, abortion, war and capital punishment differ in moral weight, but they all threaten human dignity, and we must work to end them,” she said, adding that “we look forward to the day we can stand in unity with the other Catholic publications on each of these life issues.”
“The readerships of our various publications represent a wide spectrum of views on the Catholic Church,” said National Catholic Reporter editor Dennis Coday. “That we can forge a joint statement in opposition to the death penalty is a testament to the lasting solidarity Catholics show on all issues that touch on the sanctity of life.”
The editorial noted that Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania have all put a temporary halt to the death penalty.
Noting the importance of the Supreme Court decision expected this summer, the four publications voiced their hope that the ruling will expand this moratorium to become a broader ban.
“We join our bishops in hoping the court will reach the conclusion that it is time for our nation to embody its commitment to the right to life by abolishing the death penalty once and for all.”
There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Claims that each execution deters a certain number of murders have been thoroughly discredited by social science research.
Well if you ask me I don’t want to say I am against it but I am not 100% for it and why I say that is because there is no credible evidence that shows that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Claims that each execution deters a certain number of murders have been thoroughly discredited by social science research. And at the end of the day the court system and government puts these laws out so people follow the rules. So technically it is against the law to kill someone, but no where in the law does it say that only the law enforcements can kill a murderer. Like an eye for an eye, it doesn’t say that in the laws…so killing in general is bad. killing someone who killed people just makes it worse. What do you guys think??
This pretense that Catholic doctrine has developed to an anti-capital punishment position is untenable. We believe in homogeneous development, not the dogmatic evolution of the Modernists.
Ironic that a pop-up came up on this site for financial support when I came here. No way.
I am against the death penalty as it is practiced in this country today but I resent this publication and others that have attempted to pass off abolition of the death penalty as being the equivalent in Church teaching of abortion or euthanasia which it clearly has not been so in the past. It is disengenious to fail to address this fact an ignore para 2267 of the CCC.
In my humble opinion the death penalty is should only be used in those cases where an individual is so dangerous to others,including prisoners, that the only way to safeguard others is to remove them permanently from society which the Church states is permissible.
The USA has the longest sentences in the world, especially the United States Government sentences. The USA is looking more and more like the USSR of the bad old days.
Are we now to expect a joint statement by the Catholic media condemning life imprisonment? According to Pope Francis, “Life imprisonment is a hidden death sentence.” http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/news/detail/articolo/37110/
Anyone persuaded by the discussion above should read the utterly convincing article by Steven A. Long, wherein he says that this “editorial manifests a wondrously positivistic indifference to, and disregard for, distinctions in doctrine. That all the Doctors and Fathers of the Church—with the exception of Tertullian who died outside the faith—have taught the essential validity of capital punishment; and that it is the teaching of the Council of Trent that where all the Fathers and Doctors hold one interpretation of Scripture as the proper one, Catholics are to accept it, are two propositions that signify very little in the oppressive culture of mutationist accounts of doctrinal development.”
Read the rest: http://thomistica.net/commentary/2015/3/5/mutationist-views-of-doctrinal-development-and-the-death-penalty
All this means is that four Catholic publications are turning their back to Holy Scripture and 2000 years of Catholic Tradition. And if a precedent like this is set, which teaching will be jettisoned next? Operating unattached from Scripture and Tradition, the Church will drifting like a ship without a rudder, allowing the winds of relativism to blow it about.
“Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image.” (Genesis 9:6)
“The authorities are God’s servants, sent for your good. But if you are doing wrong, of course you should be afraid, for they have the power to punish you. They are God’s servants, sent for the very purpose of punishing those who do what is wrong.” (Romans 13:4)
“It must be remembered that power was granted by God [to the magistrates], and to avenge crime by the sword was permitted. He who carries out this vengeance is God’s minister (Romans 13:1-4). Why should we condemn a practice that all hold to be permitted by God? We uphold, therefore, what has been observed until now, in order not to alter the discipline and so that we may not appear to act contrary to God’s authority.”
Pope St. Innoncent I, Epist. 6, C. 3. 8, ad Exsuperium, Episcopum Tolosanum,
20 February 405 AD
“When it is a question of the execution of a man condemned to death it is then reserved to the public power to deprive the condemned of the benefit of life, in expiation of his fault, when already, by his fault, he has dispossessed himself of the right to live.”
Venerable Pope Pius XII, 14 September 1952 AD
To paraphrase Cardinal Ratzinger’s famous statement about national bishop’s councils (like the USCCB) journalists have no hierarchal authority whatsoever…..
What is it with the Church and their need to stand up for these murderers? Why aren’t they standing up for the victims?!
God as Cardinal Dulles pointed out gave over 33 death penalties to the Jews. Was He cruel? He gave them in the first Person imperative. Did He think they deterred bad choices? Sure He thought they deterred….that’s why He gave them and gave Romans 13:4 for NT times within the Roman Empire which had unescapable life sentences in the mines…and had imperfect courts.
But modern Catholics along with the Euro Union and Amnesty International apparently think the opposite of God about deterrence. The US Supreme Court in its 1976 note as it stopped its own suspension of the death penalty agreed with God as it stated that, having read deterrence studies…that executions do in fact deter premeditated murders. Mexico badly needs the death penalty and has none. Brazil needs one. Those are the two largest Catholic populations and your family is 20 times safer from murder in all of death penalty East Asia than in Mexico and Brazil. One exception in East Asia…Phillipines has a higher rate of murder than the rest of East Asia and higher than the US….and now has no death penalty. Catholic countries in Europe have low murder rates because they have few non religious poor people….and they had centuries of the death penalty forming their cultures until the last 150 years. Some of Europe’s highest cultural moments occurred at times of history when they had death penalties…French high cuisine and Italy’s High Renaissance in art.
Arguing for the justice of the death penalty from the execution of Jesus seems wrong to me. That was the single greatest injustice ever committed. But God would not have directed the Chosen People to impose the death penalty in so many cases in the Old Testament if it was in its nature unjust.
The argument of Pope John Paul II and others is based on the assumption that that modern society can protect itself without recourse to the ultimate penalty, but I agree with Brother Rolf that this appraisal of the penal justice system is simply wrong. Right now, there is a large class of murderous criminals who would be better off dead. Their only reasonable chance of reforming their lives is probably to be condemned.
Furthermore, it is the duty of governments to do justice. In some cases, execution is the only just response. Think, for example, of the recent kidnap, slaughter and incineration of Mexican teenagers to prevent their peaceful protest disturbing a speech by a powerful person. Refusing to impose it in such cases threatens the whole order of justice and rule of law.
The argument made by Pope John Paul II’s 1995 encyclical, The Gospel of Life (Evangelium Vitae), where he finds that the only time executions can be justified is when they are required “to defend society” and that “as a result of steady improvements… in the penal system that such cases are very rare if not practically non existent.” The problem with this statement is that the condition of penal systems of various governments is a matter of prudential judgment and NOT a matter of doctrine. The pope could have very well be in error on this, especially since this was an encyclical to the whole world; i.e., which penal systems in the world have sufficiently improved? How does one know when a government’s penal system has sufficiently improved so as to not regard capital punishment as a legitimate option? And to whose penal systems is being referred? The United State’s? Russia’s? Spain’s? Swaziland’s? Iran’s? an indigenous tribe isolated in the jungles of Africa? How do we know when a particular society’s penal system has sufficiently improved? So now, many bishop’s position on the death penalty (as well as these Catholic publications) is based on the state of the corrections system—a position neither biblical nor theological in nature.
I’m sorry, but I cannot support this decision to call for the abolition of the death penalty (d.p.). While I respect the Register and OSV, I do not respect Amerika and the National Schismatic Reporter, (a.k.a., Fishwrap). I expect anti-constitutional & anti-biblical calls from them. Not from this fine publication, I’m afraid. It pains me that you have decided to join two well-known dissenting publications.
I don’t approve of how the d.p. is applied in the states that practice it, though. Catholics would do well to put their energies into calling for capital punishment laws in the several states, and at the federal level, to conform to the Bible, i.e., no d.p. without multiple witnesses (see Num.35:30; Deut.17:2-7, 19:15; Mt.18:15-17; 2 Cor.13:1; 1 Tim.5:19; Heb.10:28). Instead of calling for SCOTUS to violate the constitution, as they did in 1972, when they first banned the d.p.
I also don’t agree with states having to invent new drug concoctions because anti-d.p. zealots have hamstrung pharmaceutical companies from providing the chemicals that have been used since the d.p. was reaffirmed in 1977. States should just go back to hanging, which is still a humane form execution.
Conflating the d.p. with being Pro-Life/anti-abortion is not justified, at all. Abortion is ALWAYS intrinsically evil, while capital punishment is justified by God, Himself. And, as I constantly remind anti-d.p. Catholics, the Vatican executed a man as recently as 1870. Were all of those pro-d.p. popes NOT Pro-Life, either?
I greatly respect Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Francis, but I think their pastoral insights and the teaching in the modern Catechism (1997) need to be considered as part of a longer view that fully integrates the magisterium of previous popes and councils. Two examples:
“Even in the case of the death penalty the State does not dispose of the individual’s right to life. Rather public authority limits itself to depriving the offender of the good of life in expiation for his guilt, after he, through his crime, deprived himself of his own right to life.”
– Pius XII, Address to the First International Congress of Histopathology of the Nervous System (14 Sep 1952)
“Another kind of lawful slaying belongs to the civil authorities, to whom is entrusted power of life and death, by the legal and judicious exercise of which they punish the guilty and protect the innocent. The just use of this power, far from involving the crime of murder, is an act of paramount obedience to this Commandment which prohibits murder. The end of the Commandment is the preservation and security of human life. Now the punishments inflicted by the civil authority, which is the legitimate avenger of crime, naturally tend to this end, since they give security to life by repressing outrage and violence. Hence these words of David: ‘In the morning I put to death all the wicked of the land, that I might cut off all the workers of iniquity from the city of the Lord.’ (Ps 101:8)”
– Catechism of the Council of Trent, Part III, 5, n. 4 (1566)
See also Fr. George Rutler’s article in Crisis Magazine, “Hanging Concentrates the Mind” (8 Feb 2013), and Avery Cardinal Dulles essay in First Things, “Catholicism & Capital Punishment” (Apr 2001).
All of the texts mentioned above are freely accessible via the Web and should turn up fairly easily via web-search. However, supplying links in a comments section typically gets one’s comment/s blocked or (forever) stuck in a moderation queue, so I have not provided them here.
Why now on Capital Punishment? Where has the Catholic media been? We’ve been suffering the worst form of Capital Punishment;it’s called Abortion on Demand! I’ve dropped most of the Catholic media because they’ve been virtually asleep on the pro-life issue!If you doubt that fact think! 42years of slaughter and counting with no end in sight!
Most of the Catholic press has become hardened to the horror of slaughtering our own children. If they were not they would have relentlessly pressured the USCCB to revive the prolife movement to a more effective level!
For 42 years, and counting, we’ve watched our pre-born American citizens die a violent death and the Catholic press and the USCCB have not lost one martyr to the cause of life. The only ones to suffer a Capital punishment daily, and legally, are the innocent members of our human family growing in the womb!
Our Good Lord has been patient with us; how long will He continue to be?
Writers for life, at prolifedigest.com.
Ah yes…more tilting at windmills by the Don Quixote set. What passes for journalism these days has a bad habit of substituting emotion for reason, and choosing imaginary adversaries for their pointed little pens. This type incremental deconstruction of doctrine is at play throughout the world of Progressive Catholicism, not only in this misapplication of the sanctity of life teaching, but elsewhere in the debates over the integrity of the sacrament of marriage vis-a-vis reception of the Eucharist by those in defiance of canonical norms and the redefinition of homosexuality as just another venial “challenge”.
Let me play the part of Sancho Panza for just a moment. Despite the ill conceived wording of Evangelium Vitae in this area by JPII, the fact remains that 2000 years of Catholic teaching can not be wished away by good intentions. JPII may have believed, based on advice from the usual suspects, that “The State” has the means to ensure the safety of society against those who present a clear and present danger to the sanctity of life to others. But this is indeed fanciful, and clearly disproven by available data, and therefore by simple reason. The record is clear regarding the number of murders and lesser crimes committed by those behind bars who, are supposedly insulated from free society.
And as others have noted, the legal system in this country values speed and convenience over justice, resulting in plea bargained murderers returning to society on a regular basis and committing additional violence and death. The other reality is that many of the worst of the worst continue running their criminal enterprises from the relative comfort of their jail cells, authorizing murder by proxy on both the innocent and the less than innocent. But murder, nevertheless.
So please spare us the naive idealism that equates approximately 1,400 capital punishment deaths with approximately 55,000,000 infant murders by abortion since 1973, to be of essential moral equivalence. Because that is not Catholic teaching, that is a fool riding a tall horse tilting at windmills.
How can anyone call themselves a practicing Catholic and be for the death penalty? We cannot pick and choose what we want to believe in and what we don’t.
Just to clarify the crucifixion of Our Lord….that was not capital punishment and cannot be compared as such. Christ died on the cross for you so you can have eternal life. His death was a sacrifice not capital punishment.
This another effeminate capitualtion away from the natural laws of order and Justice. It is not Catholic to prevent justice. This misguided attempt to prevent Justice is another nail in societies arsenal to protect itself and its morals. These novus Catholics would have prevented the greatest single act of redemption, the crucifixtion of our Lord. Then no-one would have been saved!! “Give unto Ceasr what is Ceasars and to God what is God’s”. Sometimes people act so badly as to forfeit their lives, and the State has a duty to remove them as a threat to the wellbeing of the citizens. We should not be made to Pay $100,000+ a year to keep these monsters comfortable. Let them meet their Maker, I’m sure Hell does not provide free healthcare and sex change operations.
Although I agree with the editorial, it’s sad to see the National Catholic Register signing on with The National Unccatholic Distorter. Sleep with pigs and you take on a bit of their reek. The Register might well have run its own distinct editorial on the same subject.
I too think that the death penalty is not the answer. However, I was concerned when I saw an article in which Pope Francis said life in prison was the death penalty. I believe there are some people that just should not be allowed free interaction with the public and there must be a way to protect those in prison from homicidal persons. I will admit that I do not know what the answer is.
It always seems ironic to me that the Church is against capital punishment yet if it had never existed Jesus wouldn’t have been able to die for our sins.
Capital punishment: Whoever is for stopping the death penalty has never worked or been a prisoner in a penal system in a state without capital punishment. Prisoners who have nothing to lose will murder a guard or prisoner for a carton of cigarette. These hit men are both feared and respected by the guards and other prisoners. One prisoner alone was responsible for 9 murders.
The position of this editorial seems to me a deadly failure of prudence, that is, if fails to recognize reality. The reality is that society is totally failing to protect its citizens, especially poor and minority citizens, from murderers. For example, homicide is the third highest cause of death among young black males. But even more grievous is the distraction from the willful, society-sanctioned murder of a million or more children each year by abortion, and perhaps millions more by lethal methods of birth control. Are we so despairing about saving these innocent millions that we choose to congratulate ourselves on our concern for the fate of a guilty handful? Or are we blowing smoke about a consistent life ethic because the real efforts of the Church in America to stop abortion have been so pathetic, and our insistence on using lethal birth control is so entrenched?
I wonder why these worthies do not come together to condem an even greater (proportionately) evil; voting for politicians and political parties that support and fund abortion? Talk about hypocricy and a warped sense of reality!
Sections
Home
Search




