SAN DIEGO (CNA) — The St. Gianna Physicians’ Guild has launched an online petition asking the Obama administration to remove references to contraception and contraception counseling from its new health-care guidelines and to provide a conscience clause to protect the religious freedom of Catholics.
“We are going to send a message to the Obama administration that this contraception mandate is wrong, discriminatory and violates the religious rights of Catholics all across America,” said guild president Thomas McKenna.
The San Diego-based St. Gianna’s Physicians’ Guild was founded to unite and encourage Catholic physicians and others in the health-care profession. It aims to promote and defend Catholic principles and to inspire sanctification in members’ lives. The guild is named for St. Gianna Beretta Molla, a physician and mother who died in 1962 at the age of 39. She sacrificed her life for that of her unborn daughter when she faced complications caused by a tumor that developed during her pregnancy.
On Aug. 1, the Department of Health and Human Services adopted new guidelines for women’s health that mandate coverage for surgical sterilization and all FDA-approved prescription contraceptives, including abortifacient drugs like ella. They also mandate counseling to promote contraception.
The guild’s petition charged that the guidelines are “bad medicine” because they encourage “unhealthy and immoral sexual practices” which will increase demand for more STD treatment and abortion services.
The petition said that the regulation undermines “fundamental principles of the Catholic faith.” It is “discriminatory against Catholic institutions” and violates their freedom of conscience. It is “biased” against health-care professionals.
The petition also contended that the regulation is “misleading” because increased access to birth control will increase the need for abortion. It cited the Guttmacher Institute’s finding that more than 50% of women go to abortion businesses because of failed birth control.
The administration’s announcement for the mandates also announced proposed religious exemptions. However, these applied only to nonprofit religious employers whose purpose is “the inculcation of religious values.” To qualify for the exemption, employers must primarily employ persons who share their religious tenets and must primarily serve those who share those beliefs.
“Under the new rule our institutions would be free to act in accord with Catholic teaching on life and procreation only if they were to stop hiring and serving non-Catholics,” said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ pro-life committee, on Aug. 1.
Notre Dame Law School professor O. Carter Snead told CNA on Aug. 2 that the exemption fails to cover “virtually any” Catholic institution that serves or employs non-Catholics. He said the government mandate could require contraceptive coverage for the health-care plans of Catholic universities and Catholic social-service agencies.
The petition can be found at http://stopthebirthcontrolmandate.org.
Janet Morana: Who Were the Early Feminists in the U.S.?
Edward Pentin: High Expectations for Rome March for Life 2013
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank God for The St. Gianna Physicians’ Guild. The response of Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo to the immoral requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is both inadequate and ineffective. It is time for the leaders of the church to defend the flock and the rights of freedom of conscience for all instead of fighting for the rights of its institutions. The shepherds are making a bad deal with the wolf. The deal is that as long as the wolf leaves part of the fence alone he can come in and do what he wants with the rest of the sheep. Not only will the wolf take that deal, but he is fooling the shepherds into fighting for it instead of for the sheep. There are some people in our government who would like to implement policies similar to China’s one-child policy. With mandated coverage for counseling for all women with reproductive capacity, and sterilization procedures it has begun. Instead of defending Catholic institutions, the shepherds should defend freedom and promote the cause of the individual to object to immoral laws. I am afraid that if the government throws the shepherds a bone and gives the Catholic institutions an exemption, the shepherds will not fight for life. The shepherds should be saying that they will not comply with this Act and promote the culture of death and that they don’t want the flock to comply with it either.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.