Richard Dawkins vs. Cardinal Pell Fight in Hell of a Debate - Brandon Vogt, The Thin Veil
Ten Signs You Might be Called to be a Catholic Blogger - Micah Murphy, Truth & Charity
Cardinal Turkson: The Transformative Power of Work - EWTN News/CNA
The Culture War and the Catholic Church - Tom Bethell, New Oxford Review
Baroque Naturalism and Baroque Classicism Compared - David Clayton, New Liturgical Movement
“Why Catholics Leave the Church” - Fr. Robert Barron, Integrated Catholic Life™
Philadelphia Abuse Trial: Media Ignores Key Accuser’s Criminal Past - Dave Pierre, The Media Report
Obama to Pay Pro-Lifer $120,000 For Frivolous Prosecution - Donald R. McClarey, The American Catholic
The Shroud of Turin, Represented at Every Mass - Fr. Ryan Erlenbush, New Theological Movement
Living Poverty - Anna Williams, Ignitum Today
Pepsi, Proxies, and Pro-Life Respect for the Rule of (Corporate) Law - Michael Fragoso, Public Discourse
Theodor Haecker - M. D. Aeschliman, Crisis Magazine
Scottish Cardinal Says, "Wear Crosses" - Matthew Schmitz, First Things/First Thoughts
Fr. Z Fisk's President Obama's Prayer Breakfast Sermon - Fr. Z's Blog
Newsweek Magazine Cover Attacks Christianity - Matthew Archbold, Creative Minority Report
Cardinal DiNardo, Former Ambassador to Vatican at the University of Saint Thomas (Houston) Forum - Adam Wilson, The Cardinal Newman Society Blog/Campus Notes
Western Educational Crisis: Decay of Parental Involvement and Politically Correct Agendas - Super Trad Mum, Etheldreda's Place
For the latest on the best punditry in the Catholic blogosphere click on ThePulp.it.
Comments
Post a Comment
The headline “Obama to Pay Pro-Lifer $120,000 For Frivolous Prosecution” is totally off base and incorrect. At first glance it leads one to believe that President Obama is personally going to pay $120,000. The actual article states: Obama’s Justice Department Agrees to Pay $120,000.00 To Pro-Life Protestor Over Frivolous Prosecution. Those words “Justice Department” but the story in a completely different light. If The National Catholic Register is stooping so low as to misrepresent the news to meet some political agenda, then can it be trusted to accurately guide Catholics seeking the truth about the glory of our faith? Does this not make it as vile as the National Catholic Reporter? For shame! This is the second article within a week that deceptively presented an issue, the previous being the one about the UK government and a person right to wear a crucifix.
Defender,
Nobody thought Obama was paying Pro-Lifers out of his own pocket. If he ever did anything so glorious, the world would crumble.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.