Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Our Battle Of The Bulge

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:00 PM Comments (12)

Ten months ago, the Democrats began their campaign for perpetual political dominance through the bureaucratic machine. Health care became their battle of choice. A theoretical filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and a huge numerical advantage in the House gave the Democrats a lot of firepower and they certainly had the will to use it. They made the decision that they would dominate the continent and usher in a political dynasty.  One of the first tasks of the newly-established dynasty would be to use the machinery of state to systematically exterminate a class of people—the unborn.  A horrible vision of the future emerged, yet it seemed that pro-lifers were powerless to stop it.

But then last summer a ragtag group of allies, including fiscal-conservatives, pro-lifers, pensioners, and disillusioned independents joined forces to hand the Democrats unlikely defeat, after unlikely defeat, culminating in the most unlikely election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts. To many it seemed that victory over the forces of death via health care was imminent and that all that remained was the signing of some sort of peace treaty.

Many, including me, assumed that the peace treaty would come in the form of some more modest health care proposals that would gain some level of bipartisan support and allow President Obama and the Democrats to point to at least some face-saving progress on health care, while allowing Republicans to claim victory in stopping the worst ravages of the initial proposals. Instead, the President and the Democrats decided to launch their own Battle of the Bulge.

After the Normandy invasion in the summer of 1944, the Allies advanced quickly against German forces in Europe. The Allies’ supply lines had been stretched thin and our forces became weary as winter settled in. It seemed as if ultimate allied victory was inevitable and some hoped that Germany would soon sue for peace. That was not to be.

Relieved of the need to defend the vast territories of Western Europe, the Germans could concentrate their forces on defending the homeland and on December 16, 1944 they launched the Battle of the Bulge. Rather than accept defeat, the Germans doubled-down and threw all they had at the Allies in an effort to break their resolve.

Politically, we find ourselves in a similar situation now. We thought victory over government-run health care and the federally-funded abortion that comes with it was ours. Instead, the Obama administration has doubled-down with a new and unexpected assault. The president has vowed to use the reconciliation process to push through this bill even over the continued expressed wishes of the American people.

Like our troops in the Ardennes forest during that cold winter of ‘44-‘45, we grow weary. After fighting battles for months, just when victory seemed in sight, the other side has commenced a massive new offensive. Just like the German high command, the Democrats question the Republican morale and willingness to continue fighting.

Can the forces that fought so hard against this bill during the bulk of 2009 muster enough fight to finally defeat it? Will their morale finally break?

By December 21, 1944 the German forces surrounded the town of Bastogne and the situation for the allied forces in the town was tough to say the least. Food was scarce and ammunition was almost gone. It seemed hopeless. The German commander, Generalleutnant Heinrich Freiherr von Lüttwitz, sent a request for surrender to the Allied commander in Bastogne, General Anthony McAuliffe.

General McAuliffe responded to the request for surrender with one word. The word needed to be explained to the German commander because he had no idea what it meant.

General McAuliffe responded to that request for surrender with one simple word.

“Nuts!”

The Germans attacked Bastogne, but the Allies held and the German offensive was defeated.

Today, the Obama administration similarly tests our resolve. We are tired and battle-weary and they want to know what we will do. Will we give up? Will we fold even though we have come so far? Will we surrender?

To this I can only reply, “Nuts!”

 

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Hmmm. Comparing Obama and the Democratic Party majority to the nazis.

How original!

So is any historical reference to the German army by default a comparison to the “Nazis” now.  I don’t think so.

I think the analogy, in so far as it regards a test of will and morale, is apropos.

No, he was comparing the current political climate to a famous series of battles during WWII. Of course, seeing as how the Dems are so willing to slaughter innocent lives, it’s hard not to make the comparison.

“So is any historical reference to the German army by default a comparison to the “Nazis” now.”

Any historical reference to the the German army between 1933 - 1945 would.

Good point, Craig. It’s entirely unfair to compare the Democrats to the Nazis. The Nazis couldn’t manage to exterminate anywhere close to 50 million people.

I had to laugh, at first, as I clicked on the title thinking you were announcing that one of you was deciding to lose weight!  But this article was much better.  Reminding us of the need to hang in there - either with this very appropriate WWII analogy was well-done.  Perhaps Craig wouldn’t have been offended if you had used the Revolutionary War or the Civil War?

I can agree with the General - “Nuts”  We’ll do what we have to do to win this battle - for as long as we need to!

The “souvenirs” taken by people that worked in concentration/extermination camps weren’t nearly as repulsive as those of that vile Gosnell in Philly. Although Tiller did have a crematorium in his back yard. The Nazis passed laws so everything they did was “legal”, too. Let’s not forget that Hitler was a great admirer of Margaret Sanger and his chief eugenicist, Dr. Ernst Rudin, published article in her Birth Control Review. If memory serves, Hitler borrowed the concentration camp idea from Mrs. Sanger - hers was for the mentally defective, whereas Hitler murdered his.

If HCR was solely about abortion, which it isn’t, and the Democrats had been running the government every day since Roe, which they haven’t, then I might possibly understand how the grand scenario presented above could be considered “apropos”.

If the HCR mentions, in any way, the possibility of funded abortion, then for most of us is IS solely about abortion.

I would rather we keep the HC system we have now then give abortion any more help.

Except that the HC system we have now…covers abortions!

Which is why Matthew said “any MORE help”.

500,000 signers of the Manhattan Declaration are ready to commit acts of civil disobedience rather than fund abortion with their tax payments.  So, it is a war that will get ugly if Obama succeeds in pushing his so-called health care.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

About Pat Archbold

Pat Archbold
  • Get the RSS feed
Patrick Archbold is co-founder of Creative Minority Report, a Catholic website that puts a refreshing spin on the intersection of religion, culture, and politics. When not writing, Patrick is director of information technology at a large international logistics company. Patrick, his wife Terri, and their five children reside in Long Island, N.Y.