I caught up with Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington after lunch today.
Cardinal Wuerl wears several hats at the USCCB. He is a member of the new Committee on Religious Liberty, he is leading the effort to establish the new ordinariate for Anglicans, and he is also chairman of the Committee on Doctrine, where he has been extremely active.
I asked Cardinal Wuerl to move from the macro to the micro level of the discussion on emerging threats to religious freedom. The Archdiocese of Washington has already been forced to end spousal health-care benefits for new hires at Catholic Charities in the District, following the legalization of same-sex “marriage.” Now the local Church is facing a renewed effort to legalize same-sex “marriage” in Maryland in early 2012.
Cardinal Wuerl says that the faithful and the larger community need to be educated about the new challenges to the First Amendment, and he welcomes the USCCB’s stronger focus on the issue.
“The increasing erosion of religious liberty is moving so insistently, but often subtly. We have to help our people and society to recognize there is a major shift taking place from how we once respected religious freedom,” he said. The USCCB is in the position to provide information on these developments across the whole country.
“But this is just the beginning. When more people realize what is at stake, I hope that more people will be able to share their knowledge about this threat and get involved.”
He expressed gratitude that Catholic University of America’s president, John Garvey, and Kevin Baine, a lawyer with church-state issues expertise, had already rolled up their sleeves to develop a legal and legislative strategy on this issue.
Regarding the Church’s response to the expected campaign to legalize same-sex “marriage” in Maryland, Cardinal Wuerl emphasized that he would push for a strong religious exemption if and when any legislation was introduced.
“In Maryland, we are going to be looking for an adequate religious exemption built into whatever may be passed. I don’t buy the idea that you don’t include religious protections upfront because it might discourage opposition to an attempt to legalize same-sex ‘marriage.’ We need to have this exemption, even as we fight any attempt to change marriage.”
At the end of our conversation, I asked Cardinal Wuerl about unconfirmed reports that the advancement of the Anglican-use ordinate has encountered some resistance. I asked him if there was any truth to these reports. The cardinal noted that he would be speaking about this issue during the afternoon, and it would be clear from his presentation “where all this is going. What you will see is substantial movement in the future.”
UPDATE
True to his word, Cardinal Wuerl soon appeared at the podium before his brother bishops to announce some exciting new developments for the Anglican-use ordinariate.
He reported that 35 Anglican clergy have already received approval by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and have moved on to the second stage of the process, which includes a criminal background check, a psychological evaluation and obtaining a votum from the Catholic bishop where they reside.
His address confirmed that two Anglican communities have come into full communion wit the Church in anticipation of the new ordinariate.
Finally, he announced that on Oct. 29, the Holy Father “approved the erection of an ordinariate in the U.S. The canonical erection will take place on Jan. 1, 2012, the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God. At that time, I assume, an ordinary will be named.”
The cardinal announced a number of other initiatives that will help support those who wish to join: They will have to complete a program of catechesis, made available through the ordinariate once it is functioning. A formation program for those seeking ordination as Catholic priests has also been approved, he said. That program is currently based at St. Mary’s Seminary in Houston and can be completed either on campus or through a distance learning program. St. Mary’s Seminary in Houston will provide on-site and distance catechetical training. St. Luke’s Institute will complete psychological evaluations at a reduced rate.
“I remain convinced that this ordinariate will remain a true expression of the Catholic Church,” said the cardinal. “Your involvement is one of the guarantees of that.”
Bishop Kevin Vann of Fort Worth, Texas, has been nominated the Pastoral Provision delegate for the United States.
The flurry of questions that followed the cardinal’s report suggested that many bishops are still somewhat uncertain about what this will mean and how it will all be implemented.
Indeed, responding to questions, the cardinal noted that parishes that are already a part of a particular diocese will require permission of the bishop to shift to the new ordinariate: “Each congregation will have to apply to the local bishop first before applying to the ordinariate.”
Concerns were raised about the financial viability of the ordinariate, and the cardinal acknowledged, “This ordinariate is starting from zero. ... Any help you can give would be welcome.”
But he also suggested that his brother bishops would soon see the benefit of this landmark action, noting that the Archdiocese for the Military Services would soon welcome Episcopalian priests to expand the ranks of Catholic chaplains.
I ran into Archbishop Charles Chaput after Cardinal Wuerl’s press conference and asked him whether I was correct in noticing a measure of anxiety and confusion on the part of his brother bishops.
“There’s uncertainty,” he said. “Not all questions have been asked, and when they are, it will take time to figure this out.”



Comments
Post a Comment
The former Bishop of Pgh. will befuddle you with words & as usual there will be no teeth in anything he has to say. We do not need fancy language from spineless leaders. His many fruitless years in Pgh. did not warrent his current status ?????
Grey Bear,
Wuerl’s :fruitless years in Pgh”? By your abbreviation of Pittsburgh as “Pgh”, I assume you live there as I did for over 70 years. B. Wuerl was highly respected in Pittsburgh. So I don’t know what axe you may be grinding.
Bill:
For starters he was groomed for the position by the ultra effeminate Bishop Wright. He was never a parish priest or a pastor ? He shut down & sold dozens of churches that Rome now considers too drastic & unacceptable. He thereby gutted the faith of hundreds of elderly, poor, Catholics whose families scraped & saved to pay the mortgages on those ethnic buildings. Most of all, he tried to cover-up the sexual deviate scandal, while lying to the media he was co-operating in the investigations & hiding the guilty prelates in a asylum in Maryland. There is much more Bill. It is disheartening to see the weak & spineless get promoted when what we need are more Chaput’s, Burke’s etc. Our clergy deserve respect but you do not get mine unless you earn it !
Grey Bear:
I have heard speak when he was bishop and I never thought of him as “ultra effeminate”. Further his first assignment was as assistant pastor at St. Rosalia parish in Pittsburgh’s Greenfield neighborhood, so your contention is wrong that he never served as a parish priest. And yes, he did close many churches in Pittsburgh. The city lost over 300,000 citizens as a direct result of the demise of all the steel mills, and the movement to people into the suburbs, etc. So when you lose that many people it is impossible to keep all the churches that existed to service a much greater population. How is possible to keep a large church that served a thousand people at one time but that has been reduced to a 100? Not possible. Wuerl did NOT cover-up any sexual deviants. On one prominent case he defied Rome which refused to permit Wuerl to “de-frock” a priest. Wuerl insisted and won his point. This is not conducive to your charge of “cover-up”. Further, on a more importnat point, I should like to inform you that some of your comments may be sins of rash judgment or calumny, both of which are grave matter. Check the Catechism of the Catholic Church, page 594.
A quick correction to my previous post. The first 2 sentences should read: I have heard Wright speak when he was bishop and never thought of him as “ultra effeminate”. Further Wuerl had his first assignment…
Sorry for the typos.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.