Did you hear about this?
Pro-life champion Joe Scheidler of Chicago’s Pro-Life Action League was honored last weekend for his tireless work to save the unborn.
Young pro-lifers who came out in support encountered a counter pro-abortion rally, as this YouTube video recounts.


Comments
Post a Comment
Yes, this is one of the persons and these are the kids that, “Bernardin was convinced that, if the pro-life agenda was to move forward successfully, the other threats to the supreme value of life had to be linked in solid and informed fashion to the central task of opposing abortion. A believing Catholic, in Bernardin’s judgment, must promote life organically, preserving and enhancing threats to its sacred character. Otherwise, the pro-life movement might seem distorted and could come under the control of the extreme right wing of anti-abortionist activists. That would cripple its political appeal in the struggle for a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe v. Wade. In addition, the task of raising the consciousness of the country about the values of life depend on an intelligent broadening and deepening of the basic philosophical and theological foundations of the pro-life position.” (The belief and thoughts of Cardinal Bernardin in the favorable biography by the same name written by his friend of 30 years, Eugene Kennedy).
Thus, “prolife” became “pro” hyphen “life” and Catholics, starting with the bishops, began learning that life is a “seamless garment” and began teaching - to REALLY be “prolife” we must respect every aspect of it “organically.” So, “social justice” issues were now “pro-life.” With this, most Catholic consciences were soothed in the comfort of knowing they could retain their wonderful life-long “feeling” and self-identity of being Democrats because Democrats “cared for the little people.” And with this change in the definition of “prolife,” Bernardin handed the pro-abortion supporters their biggest victory since Roe v Wade – over half of the church-going Catholics resulting in Catholic politicians becoming bolder in their support of abortion as witnessed in the Senate hearings of Republican nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court starting with Judge Bork, and culminating with 55% of Catholics voting for the first Black president of the U.S. who is also just happens to be the first ever pro-abortion, pro-infanticide president.
Yep - Bernardin and the U.S. bishops’ decision, to go along with him, on changing the definition of “prolife” some 27 years ago, certainly kept the prolife movement from falling completely “under the control of the extreme right wing of the anti-abortionist activists” like Joe Schnieder. But did “saving it” from such “extremist” bring a HLA closer to reality? When was the last time you even heard HLA mentioned in church? I bet some of you don’t even know what it means. Yes, more people say they are “pro-life” today, but Catholics registered in the pro-abortion party and voting for their parties’ candidates like Barak Obama, think they are “pro-life.”
51,000,000+ babies murdered and still counting, with no end in sight. Don’t you think it’s about time the Church rethink what they did back there under Cardinal Bernardin’s leadership and admit that it was a mistake? I knew it back then, when he and the bishops redefined “prolife,” that it was a mistake. Time has proven me right, and Cardinal Bernardin and the entire Conference of Catholic Bishops, wrong. I wish it was the other way around; I would love to be able to say I was wrong and the bishops were right. Think they’d ever be able to say that?
The standard of truth :Biblical theology revealed in Matthew Gospel 15:1-3 ” Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem,saying, why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they wash not their hands when they eat bread . But he answered and said unto them, why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?
It is such a pleasure to see the mediums and methods of revelation in this present moment in time. According to biblical theology : Man Desirous of knowing God’s will and this desire a duty, According to revelation ,the book of Jodhua 9:14 ” And the men took of their victuals, and asked not counsel at the mouth of the Lord.
As we strive to live out our catholic faith , we know from revelation : Sin preventing the knowledge of God’s will ( 1Samuel 14:36-38 ) ” And Saul said , Let us go down after the Philistines by night ,and spoil them untilnthe morning light, and let us not leave a man of them. and they said, Do whatsoever see meth good unto thee . Then said the priest, Let us draw near hither unto God. And Saul counsel of God , Shall I go down after the Philidtines? Wilt thou deliver them into the hand of Israel ? But he answered him not that day .And Saul said, Draw ye near hither, all the chief of the people: and know and see wherein this sin hath been this day .
Peace to alll !
:( oops. Joe Scheidler; not what I wrote in paragraph number 3, Schnieder.
Let us reflect on the meaning of witness: Historical Digest ; Under the Modaic Law , it was necessary to have at least two witnesses in order to convict a prisoner ( Deuteronomy 17:6) ; and if thevoffender were condemned to be stoned, the witnesses were obliged to cast the first stones ( Deuternonmy 17:7) A false witness was to receive the punishment which he had endeavored to bring upon the prisoner by his testimony ( Deiteronomy 19:19),
Punishment - The general law of recompense was the supreme principle of the law of Moses: ” Breach for breach , eye for eye , tooth for tooth : as he hath caused a blemish in a man ,so shall it be done to him ( again) . And he that Killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that Killeth a man , he shall be put to death,. ye shall have for one of your own country : for I ( am) the Lord your God ( Leviticus 24:20-25) ( Leviticus 24:17-19) Moses , however ,did not allow parents to be out to death for their children , nor children for their parents ( Deutetpnomy 24:16) as did the Chaldeans ( Daniel 6:25) and the King’s of Israel ( 1 King 21;2King9:26)
The subject of Abortion being used as a platform for every single political agenda is gravely sinful because it leads the simple minds into absolutely error. The abortion topic is under the category of criminal laws under Biblical Law ( that will be Injury to a pregnant woman , Biblical Theology revealed from the book of Exodus 21:22-25 .And under the precept of criminal law Biblical law revealed : Individual Responsibility ( The criminal Himself , and No other ,Must answer for his crime ,Deiteronomy 24:16) Jesus solved the problem in reference to crimes against the person ( injury to a pregnant woman - Abortion ) Christ’s Law concerning the Murderous Spirit - The Gospel of Matthew 5:21-22. Christ’s Law of purity in thought - Gospel of Matthew 5:27-28 and lastly Christ’s Law of Non- Resistance - the gospel of Matthew 5:38-39
The proper use of the human reason would reduce our theological difficulties ninety per cent , our ecclesiastical machinery seventy percent and our political problems , national and international ,fifty percent. Oh, that men were wise, that they understood this, that they would Think . It has been well said that there are just to classes , those who think and those who only think they think . Think. ! !!!!!!!!
Do a service for the young generation live out the faith in clarity
Peace to all
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.